Environmental Performance: Evidence From Level-2 Regions

Zekiye Örtlek; Cuma Demirtaş; Munise Ilıkkan Özgür

Article Details

Environmental Performance: Evidence From Level-2 Regions

Authors:

Zekiye Örtlek | Cuma Demirtaş | Munise Ilıkkan Özgür

Publisher:

Ahmet Arif EREN

Journal:

Fiscaoeconomia Vol.7 Issue 1, pp.406-443

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

1/2023

Document Language:

English

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281887

pISSN:

2564-7504

Keywords:

Abstract:

 The aim of this study is to calculate the environmental performance of the Level-2 regions spanning the period between 2009 and 2020, and make policy recommendations in line with relevant findings. Multi Criteria Decision Making MCDM methods are applied for this evaluation, in which total electricity consumption per capita and number of ventures in agriculture, forestry, fishery and water supply are used as indicators. Initially, the weights of the aforementioned criteria are calculated via the Entropy method, one of the MCDM techniques. Then, the environmental performance ranking of the Level-2 Region is derived through the ARAS method. Findings show that the criterion with the highest weight is electricity consumption per capita, whereas the one with the lowest weight is water supply. In addition, ARAS method posit that while TR10 Istanbul performs the best among the sample, TR81 Zonguldak, Karabük, Bartın ranks last.

 The aim of this study is to calculate the environmental performance of the Level-2 regions spanning the period between 2009 and 2020, and make policy recommendations in line with relevant findings. Multi Criteria Decision Making MCDM methods are applied for this evaluation, in which total electricity consumption per capita and number of ventures in agriculture, forestry, fishery and water supply are used as indicators. Initially, the weights of the aforementioned criteria are calculated via the Entropy method, one of the MCDM techniques. Then, the environmental performance ranking of the Level-2 Region is derived through the ARAS method. Findings show that the criterion with the highest weight is electricity consumption per capita, whereas the one with the lowest weight is water supply. In addition, ARAS method posit that while TR10 Istanbul performs the best among the sample, TR81 Zonguldak, Karabük, Bartın ranks last.

 The aim of this study is to calculate the environmental performance of the Level-2 regions spanning the period between 2009 and 2020, and make policy recommendations in line with relevant findings. Multi Criteria Decision Making MCDM methods are applied for this evaluation, in which total electricity consumption per capita and number of ventures in agriculture, forestry, fishery and water supply are used as indicators. Initially, the weights of the aforementioned criteria are calculated via the Entropy method, one of the MCDM techniques. Then, the environmental performance ranking of the Level-2 Region is derived through the ARAS method. Findings show that the criterion with the highest weight is electricity consumption per capita, whereas the one with the lowest weight is water supply. In addition, ARAS method posit that while TR10 Istanbul performs the best among the sample, TR81 Zonguldak, Karabük, Bartın ranks last.

 The aim of this study is to calculate the environmental performance of the Level-2 regions spanning the period between 2009 and 2020, and make policy recommendations in line with relevant findings. Multi Criteria Decision Making MCDM methods are applied for this evaluation, in which total electricity consumption per capita and number of ventures in agriculture, forestry, fishery and water supply are used as indicators. Initially, the weights of the aforementioned criteria are calculated via the Entropy method, one of the MCDM techniques. Then, the environmental performance ranking of the Level-2 Region is derived through the ARAS method. Findings show that the criterion with the highest weight is electricity consumption per capita, whereas the one with the lowest weight is water supply. In addition, ARAS method posit that while TR10 Istanbul performs the best among the sample, TR81 Zonguldak, Karabük, Bartın ranks last.

Article Details

Environmental Performance: Evidence From Level-2 Regions

Authors:

Zekiye Örtlek | Cuma Demirtaş | Munise Ilıkkan Özgür

Publisher:

Ahmet Arif EREN

Journal:

Fiscaoeconomia Vol.7 Issue 1, pp.406-443

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

1/2023

Document Language:

English

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281887

pISSN:

2564-7504

Level-2 Region

Environmental Performance Index

Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method

Entropy Method

ARAS Method

Issues

Article Details

Environmental Performance: Evidence From Level-2 Regions

Authors: Zekiye Örtlek | Cuma Demirtaş | Munise Ilıkkan Özgür

Publisher: Ahmet Arif EREN

Journal: Fiscaoeconomia Vol.7 Issue 1, pp.406-443

Document Type: Article

Publication Date: 1/2023

Document Language: English

Document ID (Org No.): 2001281887

pISSN: 2564-7504

Level-2 Region

Environmental Performance Index

Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method

Entropy Method

ARAS Method

Issues

Authors:

Zekiye Örtlek | Cuma Demirtaş | Munise Ilıkkan Özgür

Publisher:

Ahmet Arif EREN

Journal:

Fiscaoeconomia Vol.7 Issue 1, pp.406-443

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

1/2023

Document Language:

English

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281887

pISSN:

2564-7504