Success in Basic Life Support Education; "Individual Education?", "Group Education?": Pretest Posttest Randomized Controlled Study

Maide Yeşilyurt; Saide Faydalı

Article Details

Success in Basic Life Support Education; "Individual Education?", "Group Education?": Pretest Posttest Randomized Controlled Study

Authors:

Maide Yeşilyurt | Saide Faydalı

Publisher:

Duzce University

Main Topics:

Hemşirelik (Diğer)

Journal:

Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer Vol.14 Issue 3, pp.403-410

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

9/2024

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001327503

pISSN:

2792-0542

Keywords:

Abstract:

 Aim: The study aimed to determine the effect of basic life support training given to nursing students in a simulation environment with two different techniques, individual and group study, on their skill level. Material and methods: This experimental research was conducted with 3rd grade nursing undergraduate students n92 taking the first aid course at the Simulation and Modeling Application and Research Center. After training on basic life support BLS with explanation and demonstration techniques, a pre-test was conducted in the classroom environment for all students. Before starting the simulation application, according to the stratified randomization method, the students were assigned to arms 46 each to be equivalent in terms of their academic averages. In collecting data, a questionnaire and checklist prepared by the researchers in line with the literature were used. The final test was conducted 30 days after the simulation application. Results: When the BLS application levels of the students before and after the training are examined, the average number of correct applications in the individual arm increased from 8.972.46 to 15.281.75, and in the group arm it increased from 8.472.04 to 14.042.74.While the number of BLS correct applications of students in both arms increased significantly within the group p0.05, there was no difference between the arms. Students characteristics had no effect on BLS application success. Conclusion: When comparing individual and group simulation in BLS training, it was determined that there was no difference in the development of application skills. It is recommended that new comparative studies be conducted.

 Aim: The study aimed to determine the effect of basic life support training given to nursing students in a simulation environment with two different techniques, individual and group study, on their skill level. Material and methods: This experimental research was conducted with 3rd grade nursing undergraduate students n92 taking the first aid course at the Simulation and Modeling Application and Research Center. After training on basic life support BLS with explanation and demonstration techniques, a pre-test was conducted in the classroom environment for all students. Before starting the simulation application, according to the stratified randomization method, the students were assigned to arms 46 each to be equivalent in terms of their academic averages. In collecting data, a questionnaire and checklist prepared by the researchers in line with the literature were used. The final test was conducted 30 days after the simulation application. Results: When the BLS application levels of the students before and after the training are examined, the average number of correct applications in the individual arm increased from 8.972.46 to 15.281.75, and in the group arm it increased from 8.472.04 to 14.042.74.While the number of BLS correct applications of students in both arms increased significantly within the group p0.05, there was no difference between the arms. Students characteristics had no effect on BLS application success. Conclusion: When comparing individual and group simulation in BLS training, it was determined that there was no difference in the development of application skills. It is recommended that new comparative studies be conducted.

 Aim: The study aimed to determine the effect of basic life support training given to nursing students in a simulation environment with two different techniques, individual and group study, on their skill level. Material and methods: This experimental research was conducted with 3rd grade nursing undergraduate students n92 taking the first aid course at the Simulation and Modeling Application and Research Center. After training on basic life support BLS with explanation and demonstration techniques, a pre-test was conducted in the classroom environment for all students. Before starting the simulation application, according to the stratified randomization method, the students were assigned to arms 46 each to be equivalent in terms of their academic averages. In collecting data, a questionnaire and checklist prepared by the researchers in line with the literature were used. The final test was conducted 30 days after the simulation application. Results: When the BLS application levels of the students before and after the training are examined, the average number of correct applications in the individual arm increased from 8.972.46 to 15.281.75, and in the group arm it increased from 8.472.04 to 14.042.74.While the number of BLS correct applications of students in both arms increased significantly within the group p0.05, there was no difference between the arms. Students characteristics had no effect on BLS application success. Conclusion: When comparing individual and group simulation in BLS training, it was determined that there was no difference in the development of application skills. It is recommended that new comparative studies be conducted.

 Amaç: Araştırmada bireysel ve grup çalışması şeklinde iki farklı teknikle hemşirelik öğrencilerine simülasyon ortamında verilen temel yaşam desteği eğitiminin beceri düzeyine etkisinin belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Deneysel düzende yürütülen araştırma, Simülasyon ve Modelleme Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezinde ilk yardım dersini alan n92 III. sınıf hemşirelik lisans öğrencileri ile gerçekleştirildi. Temel yaşam desteği ile ilgili anlatım ve gösterim tekniği ile eğitim verildikten sonra tüm öğrencilere sınıf ortamında ön test gerçekleştirildi. Simülasyon uygulamasına başlamadan tabakalı randomizasyon yöntemine göre, öğrenciler akademik ortalamaları yönünden eş değer olacak şekilde kollara 46şar kişi atandı. Verilerin toplanmasında, araştırmacılar tarafından literatür doğrultusunda hazırlanan soru formu ve kontrol listesi kullanıldı. Simülasyon uygulamasından 30 gün sonra son test gerçekleştirildi. Bulgular: Öğrencilerin eğitim öncesi ve sonrası temel yaşam desteği uygulama düzeyleri incelendiğinde; bireysel kolda doğru uygulama sayıları ortalama 8,972,46dan 15,281,75e, grup kolunda ise 8,472,04den 14,042,74e yükseldi. Her iki koldaki öğrencilerinde temel yaşam desteği doğru uygulama sayıları grup içinde anlamlı artış gösterirken p0,05, kollar arasında fark bulunmadı. Öğrencilerin özelliklerinin temel yaşam desteği uygulama başarısı üzerinde etkisi bulunmadı. Sonuç: Temel yaşam desteği eğitiminde bireysel ve grupla simülasyonu karşılaştırıldığında uygulama becerisinin gelişmesinde fark olmadığı saptandı. Karşılaştırmalı yeni çalışmaların yapılması önerilir.

Article Details

Success in Basic Life Support Education; "Individual Education?", "Group Education?": Pretest Posttest Randomized Controlled Study

Authors:

Maide Yeşilyurt | Saide Faydalı

Publisher:

Duzce University

Main Topics:

Hemşirelik (Diğer)

Journal:

Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer Vol.14 Issue 3, pp.403-410

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

9/2024

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001327503

pISSN:

2792-0542

education

nursing students

simulation training

basic life supporteğitim

hemşirelik öğrencileri

simülasyon eğitimi

temel yaşam desteği

Issues

Article Details

Authors: Maide Yeşilyurt | Saide Faydalı

Publisher: Duzce University

Main Topics: Hemşirelik (Diğer)

Journal: Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer Vol.14 Issue 3, pp.403-410

Document Type: Article

Publication Date: 9/2024

Document Language: Turkish

Document ID (Org No.): 2001327503

pISSN: 2792-0542

Issues

Authors:

Maide Yeşilyurt | Saide Faydalı

Publisher:

Duzce University

Main Topics:

Hemşirelik (Diğer)

Journal:

Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer Vol.14 Issue 3, pp.403-410

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

9/2024

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001327503

pISSN:

2792-0542