CAUSING OF BEING IGNORANT OF THE NARRATION TO OPPOSITION TO THE HADITH AT THE SAHABA AND TÂBI’ÛN

Ahmet Ökdem; Süleyman Doğanay

Article Details

CAUSING OF BEING IGNORANT OF THE NARRATION TO OPPOSITION TO THE HADITH AT THE SAHABA AND TÂBI’ÛN

Authors:

Ahmet Ökdem | Süleyman Doğanay

Publisher:

Erciyes University

Main Topics:

Hadis

Journal:

Erciyes Akademi Vol.39 Issue 2, pp.395-424

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

6/2025

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001351707

pISSN:

2757-7031

Keywords:

Abstract:

 When the marfu hadiths on some subjects are compared with the fatwas and practices of some of the sahaba and tābiūn on that subject, it is seen that there is a conflict between them. Marfu hadith is considered evidence in Islamic legislation. Sahaba and tābiūn are expected to give fatwa in accordance with the marfu hadiths or to practise them accordingly, due to their position and qualifications. However, in many issues the opposite is the situation. This is an issue that needs to be analyzed. We have determined that one of the reasons why the sahaba and tābiūn opposed marfu hadiths was that they were not aware of that marfu hadith. Many examples related the sahaba and the tābiūn have been cited that demonstrate this. However, at this point, it will be necessary to explain the reasons why the sahaba and tābiūn were not aware of some hadiths, although they gave importance to hadith and sunnah. The reasons related to the sahaba and the tābiūn are examined under separate headings. At this point, reasons such as sahaba not always being with the Prophet, distribution to different geographies, being cautious in narrating hadiths, being content with narrating little, narrating based necessity, their hadiths not being in demand or not being able to find students, regionalism, the insufficiency of the journeys for hadiths and the tahammul of hadith based on need considered. Regarding the tābiūn, issues such as the condition of journeys rihle, regionalism, reluctance towards multiple narrations, narrating hadiths in response to questions and the tahammül of hadiths based on necessity have been discussed. As a result, the possibilities of the period, vurûd and îrâd of the hadiths and the attitude of on tahammul and edâ of hadith caused some hadiths not to reach some sahaba or tābiūn. For this reason, they were able to exhibit fatwas and practices opposing the hadith, as they made inferences with other evidence, unaware of the hadith that had not reached them.

 When the marfu hadiths on some subjects are compared with the fatwas and practices of some of the sahaba and tābiūn on that subject, it is seen that there is a conflict between them. Marfu hadith is considered evidence in Islamic legislation. Sahaba and tābiūn are expected to give fatwa in accordance with the marfu hadiths or to practise them accordingly, due to their position and qualifications. However, in many issues the opposite is the situation. This is an issue that needs to be analyzed. We have determined that one of the reasons why the sahaba and tābiūn opposed marfu hadiths was that they were not aware of that marfu hadith. Many examples related the sahaba and the tābiūn have been cited that demonstrate this. However, at this point, it will be necessary to explain the reasons why the sahaba and tābiūn were not aware of some hadiths, although they gave importance to hadith and sunnah. The reasons related to the sahaba and the tābiūn are examined under separate headings. At this point, reasons such as sahaba not always being with the Prophet, distribution to different geographies, being cautious in narrating hadiths, being content with narrating little, narrating based necessity, their hadiths not being in demand or not being able to find students, regionalism, the insufficiency of the journeys for hadiths and the tahammul of hadith based on need considered. Regarding the tābiūn, issues such as the condition of journeys rihle, regionalism, reluctance towards multiple narrations, narrating hadiths in response to questions and the tahammül of hadiths based on necessity have been discussed. As a result, the possibilities of the period, vurûd and îrâd of the hadiths and the attitude of on tahammul and edâ of hadith caused some hadiths not to reach some sahaba or tābiūn. For this reason, they were able to exhibit fatwas and practices opposing the hadith, as they made inferences with other evidence, unaware of the hadith that had not reached them.

 When the marfu hadiths on some subjects are compared with the fatwas and practices of some of the sahaba and tābiūn on that subject, it is seen that there is a conflict between them. Marfu hadith is considered evidence in Islamic legislation. Sahaba and tābiūn are expected to give fatwa in accordance with the marfu hadiths or to practise them accordingly, due to their position and qualifications. However, in many issues the opposite is the situation. This is an issue that needs to be analyzed. We have determined that one of the reasons why the sahaba and tābiūn opposed marfu hadiths was that they were not aware of that marfu hadith. Many examples related the sahaba and the tābiūn have been cited that demonstrate this. However, at this point, it will be necessary to explain the reasons why the sahaba and tābiūn were not aware of some hadiths, although they gave importance to hadith and sunnah. The reasons related to the sahaba and the tābiūn are examined under separate headings. At this point, reasons such as sahaba not always being with the Prophet, distribution to different geographies, being cautious in narrating hadiths, being content with narrating little, narrating based necessity, their hadiths not being in demand or not being able to find students, regionalism, the insufficiency of the journeys for hadiths and the tahammul of hadith based on need considered. Regarding the tābiūn, issues such as the condition of journeys rihle, regionalism, reluctance towards multiple narrations, narrating hadiths in response to questions and the tahammül of hadiths based on necessity have been discussed. As a result, the possibilities of the period, vurûd and îrâd of the hadiths and the attitude of on tahammul and edâ of hadith caused some hadiths not to reach some sahaba or tābiūn. For this reason, they were able to exhibit fatwas and practices opposing the hadith, as they made inferences with other evidence, unaware of the hadith that had not reached them.

 Bazı konulardaki merfû hadisler o konudaki sahâbe ve tâbiînden bazılarının fetvâları ve uygulamalarıyla karşılaştırıldığında aralarında ihtilaf olduğunu görülmektedir. Merfû hadis İslam teşrîinde bir delildir. Sahâbe ve tâbiînden bulundukları konumları ve nitelikleri itibariyle merfû hadislere uygun fetvâ vermeleri veya uygulamada bulunmaları beklenmektedir. Ancak birçok meselede bunun aksine bir durum görülmektedir. Bu ise tahlil edilmesi gereken bir meseledir. Bu çalışmada, sahâbe ve tâbiînin merfû hadislere muhâlefet etmelerinde, merfû hadisten haberdar olmamalarının ne derece etkili olduğu tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bunu gösteren sahâbe ve tâbiînle ilgili birçok örnek zikredilmiştir. Ancak bu noktada sahâbe ve tâbiînin hadis ve sünnete olan düşkünlüklerine rağmen bazı hadislerden haberdar olamamalarının nedenlerini açıklamak gerekecektir. Bu nedenlerden sahâbe ve tâbiînle ilgili olanlar ayrı başlıklar altında incelenmiştir. Bu noktada sahâbenin her zaman Hz. Peygamberin yanında bulunamaması, farklı coğrafyaya dağılmış olmaları, hadis rivâyetinde ihtiyat etmeleri, az rivâyetle yetinmeleri, ihtiyaca binaen rivayeti, bir sahâbînin hadisine rağbet edilmemesi veya, öğrenci bulamaması, bölgecilik, rihlelerin mecut durumu ve ihtiyaca bağlı hadis tahammülü gibi sebepler üzerinde durulmuştur. Tâbiînle ilgili olarak, rihlelerin mevcut durumu, bölgecilik, çok rivâyete karşı olmaları, soruya binaen hadis rivâyeti, ihtiyaç sebepli hadis tahammülü konuları ele alınmıştır. Sonuç olarak dönemin imkanları, hadislerin vurûdu ve îrâdı, sahâbe ve tâbiînin hadis edâ ve tahammülündeki tutumu bazı hadislerin bazı sahâbe veya tâbiîne ulaşmamasına sebep olmuştur. Böylece, kendilerine ulaşmayan hadisten habersiz olarak başka delillerle istidlalde bulunmaları sebebiyle, hadise muhalif fetva ve uygulamalar sergileyebilmişlerdir.

Article Details

CAUSING OF BEING IGNORANT OF THE NARRATION TO OPPOSITION TO THE HADITH AT THE SAHABA AND TÂBI’ÛN

Authors:

Ahmet Ökdem | Süleyman Doğanay

Publisher:

Erciyes University

Main Topics:

Hadis

Journal:

Erciyes Akademi Vol.39 Issue 2, pp.395-424

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

6/2025

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001351707

pISSN:

2757-7031

Hadith

Sahaba

Tâbi’ûn

Opposition

Not to reach hadithHadis

Sahâbe

Tâbiîn

Muhâlefet

Hadisin ulaşmaması

Issues

Article Details

Authors: Ahmet Ökdem | Süleyman Doğanay

Publisher: Erciyes University

Main Topics: Hadis

Journal: Erciyes Akademi Vol.39 Issue 2, pp.395-424

Document Type: Article

Publication Date: 6/2025

Document Language: Turkish

Document ID (Org No.): 2001351707

pISSN: 2757-7031

Issues

Authors:

Ahmet Ökdem | Süleyman Doğanay

Publisher:

Erciyes University

Main Topics:

Hadis

Journal:

Erciyes Akademi Vol.39 Issue 2, pp.395-424

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

6/2025

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001351707

pISSN:

2757-7031