Judicial Review Of The Sharing Principles In The Construction Contract In Return For Land Share Issued With The Decision Of Reconstruction Of New Buildings Within The Scope Of Urban Transformation

Özkan Özyakışır

Article Details

Judicial Review Of The Sharing Principles In The Construction Contract In Return For Land Share Issued With The Decision Of Reconstruction Of New Buildings Within The Scope Of Urban Transformation

Authors:

Özkan Özyakışır

Publisher:

Erzincan Binali Yildirim University

Main Topics:

Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum

Journal:

Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.459-493

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

6/2025

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350345

pISSN:

2651-494X

Keywords:

Abstract:

 Every earthquake brings the problems and delays encountered in the urban transformation process back to the agenda. The rapid and healthy execution of this process is of great importance in terms of ensuring the safety of life and property. The State is under the obligation to protect the right to life, to provide people with a healthy environment and to take measures to meet the need for housing. Actually, identifying and eliminating the problems experienced in the urban transformation process and the factors that cause delays arise as a requirement of these obligations. To accelerate the urban transformation, the legislator has accepted that the decision to rebuild on the land where the risky building is located can be taken by the absolute majority of the shareholders in proportion to their shares. If the shareholders disagree, their land shares are put up for sale. In practice, a new building is usually constructed on the land where the demolished risky building is located through a construction contract in return for land share. However, disputes arise over the sharing principles stipulated in this contract. Stakeholders rejecting the sharing principles and refrain from signing the contract face the risk of sale of their land shares. Judicial review of the sharing principles in the construction contract in return for land share, which is organized with the decision to rebuild within the scope of urban transformation, is of great importance in terms of protecting the property rights of the shareholders who refrain from signing the contract.

 Every earthquake brings the problems and delays encountered in the urban transformation process back to the agenda. The rapid and healthy execution of this process is of great importance in terms of ensuring the safety of life and property. The State is under the obligation to protect the right to life, to provide people with a healthy environment and to take measures to meet the need for housing. Actually, identifying and eliminating the problems experienced in the urban transformation process and the factors that cause delays arise as a requirement of these obligations. To accelerate the urban transformation, the legislator has accepted that the decision to rebuild on the land where the risky building is located can be taken by the absolute majority of the shareholders in proportion to their shares. If the shareholders disagree, their land shares are put up for sale. In practice, a new building is usually constructed on the land where the demolished risky building is located through a construction contract in return for land share. However, disputes arise over the sharing principles stipulated in this contract. Stakeholders rejecting the sharing principles and refrain from signing the contract face the risk of sale of their land shares. Judicial review of the sharing principles in the construction contract in return for land share, which is organized with the decision to rebuild within the scope of urban transformation, is of great importance in terms of protecting the property rights of the shareholders who refrain from signing the contract.

 Every earthquake brings the problems and delays encountered in the urban transformation process back to the agenda. The rapid and healthy execution of this process is of great importance in terms of ensuring the safety of life and property. The State is under the obligation to protect the right to life, to provide people with a healthy environment and to take measures to meet the need for housing. Actually, identifying and eliminating the problems experienced in the urban transformation process and the factors that cause delays arise as a requirement of these obligations. To accelerate the urban transformation, the legislator has accepted that the decision to rebuild on the land where the risky building is located can be taken by the absolute majority of the shareholders in proportion to their shares. If the shareholders disagree, their land shares are put up for sale. In practice, a new building is usually constructed on the land where the demolished risky building is located through a construction contract in return for land share. However, disputes arise over the sharing principles stipulated in this contract. Stakeholders rejecting the sharing principles and refrain from signing the contract face the risk of sale of their land shares. Judicial review of the sharing principles in the construction contract in return for land share, which is organized with the decision to rebuild within the scope of urban transformation, is of great importance in terms of protecting the property rights of the shareholders who refrain from signing the contract.

 Meydana gelen her deprem, kentsel dönüşüm sürecinde karşılaşılan sorunları ve gecikmeleri yeniden gündeme getirmektedir. Bu sürecin hızlı ve sağlıklı bir şekilde yürütülmesi, can ve mal güvenliğinin sağlanması bakımından büyük öneme sahiptir. Devlet, yaşam hakkını koruma, insanlara sağlıklı ve dengeli bir çevre sağlama ve konut ihtiyacını karşılamaya yönelik tedbirleri alma yükümlülüğü altındadır. Nitekim, kentsel dönüşüm sürecinde yaşanan sorunların ve gecikmeye sebep olan etkenlerin belirlenip ortadan kaldırılması, söz konusu yükümlülüklerin bir gereği olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Kanun koyucu, kentsel dönüşüm sürecinin hızlandırılması amacıyla, riskli yapının bulunduğu arsada yeniden bina yaptırılması kararının, hisseleri oranında paydaşların salt çoğunluğu ile alınabileceğini kabul etmiştir. Söz konusu karara katılmayan paydaşların ise, arsa payları satışa çıkarılmaktadır. Uygulamada, yıktırılan riskli yapının bulunduğu arsada, genellikle arsa payı karşılığı inşaat sözleşmesi aracılığıyla yeniden bina yaptırılmaktadır. Fakat söz konusu sözleşmede öngörülen paylaşım esasları üzerinde sıklıkla uyuşmazlıklar yaşanır. Paylaşım esaslarını reddeden ve bu sebeple sözleşmeyi imzalamaktan kaçınan paydaşlar, arsa paylarının satış riski ile karşılaşırlar. Bu hâlde, kentsel dönüşüm kapsamında yeniden bina yaptırılması kararı ile düzenlenen arsa payı karşılığı inşaat sözleşmesindeki paylaşım esaslarının yargısal denetimi, sözleşmeyi imzalamaktan kaçınan paydaşların mülkiyet haklarının korunması bakımından büyük bir öneme sahiptir.

Article Details

Judicial Review Of The Sharing Principles In The Construction Contract In Return For Land Share Issued With The Decision Of Reconstruction Of New Buildings Within The Scope Of Urban Transformation

Authors:

Özkan Özyakışır

Publisher:

Erzincan Binali Yildirim University

Main Topics:

Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum

Journal:

Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.459-493

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

6/2025

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350345

pISSN:

2651-494X

Urban transformation

property right

risky building

construction contract in return for land share

quorum

judicial review.Kentsel dönüşüm

mülkiyet hakkı

riskli yapı

arsa payı karşılığında inşaat sözleşmesi

karar yeter sayısı

yargısal denetim.

Issues

Article Details

Authors: Özkan Özyakışır

Publisher: Erzincan Binali Yildirim University

Main Topics: Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum

Journal: Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.459-493

Document Type: Article

Publication Date: 6/2025

Document Language: Turkish

Document ID (Org No.): 2001350345

pISSN: 2651-494X

Issues

Authors:

Özkan Özyakışır

Publisher:

Erzincan Binali Yildirim University

Main Topics:

Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum

Journal:

Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.459-493

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

6/2025

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350345

pISSN:

2651-494X