SCIENCES THAT THE EXAMINER SHOULD KNOW: A COMPARISON OF ISFAHANÎ AND SUYÛTÎ

Hacı Önen

Article Details

SCIENCES THAT THE EXAMINER SHOULD KNOW: A COMPARISON OF ISFAHANÎ AND SUYÛTÎ

Authors:

Hacı Önen

Publisher:

Dicle University

Main Topics:

Din | Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları

Journal:

Dicle İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 2, pp.495-513

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

4/2023

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281988

pISSN:

2667-6273

Keywords:

Abstract:

 What the sources of tafsir are and who can make tafsir is a matter that has been discussed since the early period. In the historical process, people who are not competent in their own personal, sectarian, etc. their interpretations from different angles caused reactions. This situation has resulted in the search for some conditions in the mufessir. Because of these conditions, the idea that the mufessir should know some sciences has emerged. Different opinions have been expressed about the sciences that the mufessir should know. The sciences that the mufesir should know vary according to time and conditions. In this respect, there are differences between the views of the scholars of the classical period and those of the thinkers who lived recently. Therefore, while the subject of sciences that the müfesir should know, different periods should be evaluated within the framework of their own period. In this regard, Süyûtî d. 9111505 and Râgıb al-Isfahani d. 4001010? are among the most important scholars who expressed their views on this issue. In this study, we will try to compare the views of the two mufessirs on the sciences that the mufessir should know.

 What the sources of tafsir are and who can make tafsir is a matter that has been discussed since the early period. In the historical process, people who are not competent in their own personal, sectarian, etc. their interpretations from different angles caused reactions. This situation has resulted in the search for some conditions in the mufessir. Because of these conditions, the idea that the mufessir should know some sciences has emerged. Different opinions have been expressed about the sciences that the mufessir should know. The sciences that the mufesir should know vary according to time and conditions. In this respect, there are differences between the views of the scholars of the classical period and those of the thinkers who lived recently. Therefore, while the subject of sciences that the müfesir should know, different periods should be evaluated within the framework of their own period. In this regard, Süyûtî d. 9111505 and Râgıb al-Isfahani d. 4001010? are among the most important scholars who expressed their views on this issue. In this study, we will try to compare the views of the two mufessirs on the sciences that the mufessir should know.

 What the sources of tafsir are and who can make tafsir is a matter that has been discussed since the early period. In the historical process, people who are not competent in their own personal, sectarian, etc. their interpretations from different angles caused reactions. This situation has resulted in the search for some conditions in the mufessir. Because of these conditions, the idea that the mufessir should know some sciences has emerged. Different opinions have been expressed about the sciences that the mufessir should know. The sciences that the mufesir should know vary according to time and conditions. In this respect, there are differences between the views of the scholars of the classical period and those of the thinkers who lived recently. Therefore, while the subject of sciences that the müfesir should know, different periods should be evaluated within the framework of their own period. In this regard, Süyûtî d. 9111505 and Râgıb al-Isfahani d. 4001010? are among the most important scholars who expressed their views on this issue. In this study, we will try to compare the views of the two mufessirs on the sciences that the mufessir should know.

 Tefsir ilminin kaynaklarının neler olduğu ve kimlerin tefsir yapabileceği hususu erken dönemden itibaren tartışılmıştır. Tarihi süreç içinde ehil olmayan kişilerin kendi şahsî, mezhebî vb. açılardan tefsir yapmaları tepkilere neden olmuştur. Bu durum müfessirde bazı şartların aranması sonucunu doğurmuştur. Bu şartlardan dolayı müfessirin bazı ilimleri bilmesi gerektiği fikri ortaya çıkmıştır. Müfessirin bilmesi gereken ilimler hususunda ihtilaflı birçok görüş ortaya çıkmıştır. Müfessirin bilmesi gereken ilimler, zamana ve şartlara göre değişmektedir. Bu bakımdan klasik dönem âlimlerinin görüşleri ile yakın zamanda yaşamış düşünürlerin görüşleri arasında farklılıklar görünmektedir. Bundan dolayı Müfessirin bilmesi gereken ilimler konusu ele alınırken farklı dönemler, kendi dönemi çerçevesinde değerlendirilmelidir. Bu hususta Râgıb el-İsfahânî ö.4001010 ? ve Süyûtî ö. 9111505 görüşlerini ifade eden en önemli âlimler arasındadır. Bu çalışmada bahsi geçen iki müfessirin, müfessirin bilmesi gereken ilimler hususundaki görüş ve yaklaşımlarını mukayeseli bir şekilde ele almaya çalışacağız.

Article Details

SCIENCES THAT THE EXAMINER SHOULD KNOW: A COMPARISON OF ISFAHANÎ AND SUYÛTÎ

Authors:

Hacı Önen

Publisher:

Dicle University

Main Topics:

Din | Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları

Journal:

Dicle İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 2, pp.495-513

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

4/2023

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281988

pISSN:

2667-6273

Tefsir

Müfessir

İlim

Süyûtî

İsfahanî

Issues

Article Details

SCIENCES THAT THE EXAMINER SHOULD KNOW: A COMPARISON OF ISFAHANÎ AND SUYÛTÎ

Authors: Hacı Önen

Publisher: Dicle University

Main Topics: Din | Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları

Journal: Dicle İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 2, pp.495-513

Document Type: Article

Publication Date: 4/2023

Document Language: Turkish

Document ID (Org No.): 2001281988

pISSN: 2667-6273

Tefsir

Müfessir

İlim

Süyûtî

İsfahanî

Issues

Authors:

Hacı Önen

Publisher:

Dicle University

Main Topics:

Din | Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları

Journal:

Dicle İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 2, pp.495-513

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

4/2023

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281988

pISSN:

2667-6273