The Issue Of Whether It Is Necessary To Indıcate In The Petıtıon That The Case Has Been Fıled As An Undetermıned Claım Lawsuıt

Nurbanu Erzurumlu Işık

Article Details

The Issue Of Whether It Is Necessary To Indıcate In The Petıtıon That The Case Has Been Fıled As An Undetermıned Claım Lawsuıt

Authors:

Nurbanu Erzurumlu Işık

Publisher:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Main Topics:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Journal:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.179-221

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

7/2024

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324437

pISSN:

2149-5831

Keywords:

Abstract:

 Pursuant to Article 107 of the Turkish Code of Civil Procedure, in cases where the amount and value of the claim cannot be fully and precisely determined, the creditor may file an undetermined claim lawsuit. Through this lawsuit, the creditor can request the court to determine and collect the entirety of the claim, even if the amount or value cannot be specified. In this aspect, the undetermined claim lawsuit is a type of performance lawsuit. The opportunity to initiate the undetermined claim lawsuit is not intended to limit the plaintiffs power of disposition to determine the amount of the subject matter of the lawsuit. Therefore, even when the claim is undetermined, it is possible to demand a portion of it for the time being - instead of filing an undetermined claim lawsuit. The claimant exercises this right of choice regarding undetermined claims by determining the result of the claim in the petition. In situations where it is clear from the result of the claim whether part or all of the receivable is claimed, the judge should decide by taking into account the claimants claim. In cases where the result of the claim is unclear, the judge should resolve the problem by giving a deadline within the framework of the duty of clarification. However, there are contradictions in judicial decisions on this issue.

 Pursuant to Article 107 of the Turkish Code of Civil Procedure, in cases where the amount and value of the claim cannot be fully and precisely determined, the creditor may file an undetermined claim lawsuit. Through this lawsuit, the creditor can request the court to determine and collect the entirety of the claim, even if the amount or value cannot be specified. In this aspect, the undetermined claim lawsuit is a type of performance lawsuit. The opportunity to initiate the undetermined claim lawsuit is not intended to limit the plaintiffs power of disposition to determine the amount of the subject matter of the lawsuit. Therefore, even when the claim is undetermined, it is possible to demand a portion of it for the time being - instead of filing an undetermined claim lawsuit. The claimant exercises this right of choice regarding undetermined claims by determining the result of the claim in the petition. In situations where it is clear from the result of the claim whether part or all of the receivable is claimed, the judge should decide by taking into account the claimants claim. In cases where the result of the claim is unclear, the judge should resolve the problem by giving a deadline within the framework of the duty of clarification. However, there are contradictions in judicial decisions on this issue.

 Pursuant to Article 107 of the Turkish Code of Civil Procedure, in cases where the amount and value of the claim cannot be fully and precisely determined, the creditor may file an undetermined claim lawsuit. Through this lawsuit, the creditor can request the court to determine and collect the entirety of the claim, even if the amount or value cannot be specified. In this aspect, the undetermined claim lawsuit is a type of performance lawsuit. The opportunity to initiate the undetermined claim lawsuit is not intended to limit the plaintiffs power of disposition to determine the amount of the subject matter of the lawsuit. Therefore, even when the claim is undetermined, it is possible to demand a portion of it for the time being - instead of filing an undetermined claim lawsuit. The claimant exercises this right of choice regarding undetermined claims by determining the result of the claim in the petition. In situations where it is clear from the result of the claim whether part or all of the receivable is claimed, the judge should decide by taking into account the claimants claim. In cases where the result of the claim is unclear, the judge should resolve the problem by giving a deadline within the framework of the duty of clarification. However, there are contradictions in judicial decisions on this issue.

 Alacağın miktar ve değerinin tam ve kesin olarak belirlenemediği hâllerde Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 107nci maddesi uyarınca belirsiz alacak davası açılabilmesi, alacaklıya tanınan bir imkândır. Bu dava ile alacaklı mahkemeden, miktar veya değerini belirleyemese de alacağının tamamının tespitini ve tahsilini talep edebilir. Bu yönü ile belirsiz alacak davası, eda davasının bir türüdür. Belirsiz alacak davası açabilme imkânı, davacının dava konusunun miktarını belirleme hususundaki tasarruf yetkisinin sınırlandırılabilmesi amacını taşımaz. Bu nedenle alacağın belirsiz olduğu hâllerde dahi belirsiz alacak davası açmak yerine şimdilik bir kısmının talep edilebilmesi mümkündür. Davacı belirsiz alacaklara ilişkin olarak sahip olduğu bu seçim hakkını, dava dilekçesinde talep sonucunu belirleyerek kullanır. Talep sonucundan alacağın şimdilik bir kısmının mı yoksa tamamının mı talep edildiğinin anlaşıldığı durumlarda hâkim, davacının talebini dikkate alarak karar vermelidir. Talep sonucunun belirsiz olduğu durumlarda ise hâkimin davayı aydınlatma ödevi çerçevesinde davacıya süre vererek sorunu çözüme kavuşturması gerekir. Buna karşın yargı kararları incelendiğinde bu hususta çelişkilerin bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Article Details

The Issue Of Whether It Is Necessary To Indıcate In The Petıtıon That The Case Has Been Fıled As An Undetermıned Claım Lawsuıt

Authors:

Nurbanu Erzurumlu Işık

Publisher:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Main Topics:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Journal:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.179-221

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

7/2024

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324437

pISSN:

2149-5831

Undetermined claim lawsuit

partial lawsuit

demand

jura novit curia

advice duty of the judgeBelirsiz alacak davası

kısmî dava

talep sonucu

hâkimin hukuku re’sen uygulaması

hâkimin davayı aydınlatma ödevi

Issues

Article Details

Authors: Nurbanu Erzurumlu Işık

Publisher: Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Main Topics: Hukuk (Diğer)

Journal: Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.179-221

Document Type: Article

Publication Date: 7/2024

Document Language: Turkish

Document ID (Org No.): 2001324437

pISSN: 2149-5831

Issues

Authors:

Nurbanu Erzurumlu Işık

Publisher:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Main Topics:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Journal:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.179-221

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

7/2024

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324437

pISSN:

2149-5831