Birinci İnönü Savaşı'nın Anadolu, İstanbul ve Dış Basında Karşılanışı ve Yorumu

İzzet ÖZTOPRAK

Article Details

Birinci İnönü Savaşı'nın Anadolu, İstanbul ve Dış Basında Karşılanışı ve Yorumu

Authors:

İzzet ÖZTOPRAK

Publisher:

Türk Tarih Kurumu

Main Topics:

History

Journal:

BELLETEN 2000 Vol.64 Issue 240, pp.523-540

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

8/2000

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2000886842

Frequency:

Tri-annual

eISSN:

2791-6472

pISSN:

0041-4255

Keywords:

Abstract:

 

The characterization of the First Battle of Inönü as a "pitched battle" was adopted by the Ankara government and various contemporary newspapers. Commentary and interpretations appeared in the Anatolian press and certain Istanbul newspapers, while explanations were offered for the Greek defeat and reports included mention of spontaneous demonstrations of gladness and joy in various towns. Another aspect to which attention is here directed was the influence and impact of the Allied Powers and, in particular, that of English policy. One other noteworthy point discussed at the time was the comparative importance of this battle with other pitched battles in Turkish and world history. In order to understand the lack of positive response to the Battle of Inönü on the part of certain Istanbul newspapers, it is necessary to examine their attitude toward the National Liberation movement. An additional highlight of the present study is an inquiry into the reasons for the characterization by the Greeks of this battle as a "reconnaissance offensive" and a small-scale, localized conflict. Another aspect treated by the author is the fact that, for a time, the opinions of domestic newspapers published in Greek and certain newspapers in Athens reflected the official pronouncements of the Greek government. The deceptive error of these positions as confirmed by the news commentary appearing in the Turkish and foreign press is also pointed out in the present discussion. One other point disputed by the public was whether or not the Allied Powers had given Greece "authorization." Finally, one subject of debate then current among the public in Turkey and abroad was whether or not one of the chief factors in the engagement by Greece in this battle was an attempt to prove that it had the capacity to enforce the Treaty of Sevres.

 

Türkiye Büyük Meclisi’nin açılışından önce Ocak 1920 içerisinde Ankara’da Ziraat Mektebi’nde yapılan ve Ankara Kongresi diye de anılan toplantılarda tartışılan hususlardan biri de Kuva-yı Milliye’den Düzenli Ordu’ya (Nizami Ordu) geçilmesi idi. Bu konuda Mustafa Kemal ile İsmet (İnönü) arasında yapılan görüşmelerin sonucunda üzerinde uyum sağlanan bir düşüncenin ortaya çıktığı bilinmektedir. Bu gelişmeden önce ise Ali FuatPaşa’ya 9 Eylül 1919 tarihinde bildirilen bir yazıdan; Sivas Kongresi sırasında Batı Anadolu’daki milli kuvvetlerin bir kumandaya bağlanması konusunda karar alınmış olduğu, Ali Fuad Paşa’nın da söz konusu kongre kararıyla “Garbi Anadolu Umum Kuva-yı Milliye Kumandanlığı’na” getirildiği anlaşılmaktadır. Bunu 16 Mayıs 1920 tarihli Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi Hükümeti’nin kararı izledi. Bu karara göre; Kuva-yı Milliye, Müdafaa-i Milliye teşkilatına bağlanıyor, yedirilip içirilmeleri ve öteki gereksinimleri hükümetçe üstleniliyordu. Kararın uygulanmasından da Müdafaa-i Milliye ile Maliye Vekilleri sorumlu tutuluyordu.

Article Details

Authors: İzzet ÖZTOPRAK

Publisher: Türk Tarih Kurumu

Main Topics: History

Journal: BELLETEN 2000 Vol.64 Issue 240, pp.523-540

Document Type: Article

Publication Date: 8/2000

Document Language: Turkish

Document ID (Org No.): 2000886842

Frequency: Tri-annual

eISSN: 2791-6472

pISSN: 0041-4255

Issues

Authors:

İzzet ÖZTOPRAK

Publisher:

Türk Tarih Kurumu

Main Topics:

History

Journal:

BELLETEN 2000 Vol.64 Issue 240, pp.523-540

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

8/2000

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2000886842

Frequency:

Tri-annual

eISSN:

2791-6472

pISSN:

0041-4255