DOUBLE MISTAKE IN TURKISH AND GERMAN CRIMINAL LEGAL SYSTEMS

Buket Abanoz Öztürk

Article Details

DOUBLE MISTAKE IN TURKISH AND GERMAN CRIMINAL LEGAL SYSTEMS

Authors:

Buket Abanoz Öztürk

Publisher:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Main Topics:

Hukuk

Journal:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.253-282

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

1/2023

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283835

pISSN:

2651-4141

Keywords:

Abstract:

 In this study, the concept of double-sided mistake called doppelirrtum or doppelter Irrtum in German criminal law doctrine is examined. In double-sided mistake, straight and reverse mistake occur in the same event. In this case, the perpetrator is either unable to commit the crime heshe intends to commit because of his mistake, but another crime emerges, or, although heshe assumes that there is a norm that allows his behavior, heshe makes a mistake in the objective elements justification reasons. In this study, two different types of double-sided mistake are examined. First, the combination of mistake in the objective elements of the crime and the reverse element mistake; the second is the combination of mistake in the objective elements justification reasons and mistake in the scope of the justification reasons. The authors, who find the concept of double-sided mistake unnecessary in German doctrine, state that the concept causes confusion. Some other authors draw attention to the need for the concept of double-sided mistake. In Turkish law, the concept of double-sided mistake has not been sufficiently discussed yet. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the issue of double-sided mistake, which is one of the advanced discussions of the mistake doctrine, in the context of Turkish and German Criminal Law.

 In this study, the concept of double-sided mistake called doppelirrtum or doppelter Irrtum in German criminal law doctrine is examined. In double-sided mistake, straight and reverse mistake occur in the same event. In this case, the perpetrator is either unable to commit the crime heshe intends to commit because of his mistake, but another crime emerges, or, although heshe assumes that there is a norm that allows his behavior, heshe makes a mistake in the objective elements justification reasons. In this study, two different types of double-sided mistake are examined. First, the combination of mistake in the objective elements of the crime and the reverse element mistake; the second is the combination of mistake in the objective elements justification reasons and mistake in the scope of the justification reasons. The authors, who find the concept of double-sided mistake unnecessary in German doctrine, state that the concept causes confusion. Some other authors draw attention to the need for the concept of double-sided mistake. In Turkish law, the concept of double-sided mistake has not been sufficiently discussed yet. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the issue of double-sided mistake, which is one of the advanced discussions of the mistake doctrine, in the context of Turkish and German Criminal Law.

 In this study, the concept of double-sided mistake called doppelirrtum or doppelter Irrtum in German criminal law doctrine is examined. In double-sided mistake, straight and reverse mistake occur in the same event. In this case, the perpetrator is either unable to commit the crime heshe intends to commit because of his mistake, but another crime emerges, or, although heshe assumes that there is a norm that allows his behavior, heshe makes a mistake in the objective elements justification reasons. In this study, two different types of double-sided mistake are examined. First, the combination of mistake in the objective elements of the crime and the reverse element mistake; the second is the combination of mistake in the objective elements justification reasons and mistake in the scope of the justification reasons. The authors, who find the concept of double-sided mistake unnecessary in German doctrine, state that the concept causes confusion. Some other authors draw attention to the need for the concept of double-sided mistake. In Turkish law, the concept of double-sided mistake has not been sufficiently discussed yet. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the issue of double-sided mistake, which is one of the advanced discussions of the mistake doctrine, in the context of Turkish and German Criminal Law.

 Bu çalışmada, Alman ceza hukuku doktrininde doppelirrtum veya doppelter Irrtum olarak isimlendirilen ve hakkında güncel tartışmalar yürütülen çift taraflı hata kavramı incelenmektedir. Çift taraflı hatada, olumlu düz hata ile tersine hata hali aynı olayda gerçekleşmektedir. Bu durumda fail gerçekleştirmeyi kast ettiği suçu yanılgısı nedeniyle işleyememekte fakat başka bir suç ortaya çıkmaktadır ya da davranışına izin veren bir norm olduğunu düşünmesine rağmen, iznin maddi şartlarında hataya değerlendirme hatasıyla birlikte düşmektedir. Çalışmada çift taraflı hatanın çeşitleri olarak gösterilen iki farklı hata türü incelenmektedir. Birincisi, suçun maddi unsurlarında hata ile tersine unsur hatasının birleşimi; ikincisi, hukuka uygunluk nedenlerinin maddi koşullarında hata ile iznin kapsamında hatanın birleşimidir. Alman doktrininde çift taraflı hata kavramını gereksiz bulun yazarlar, kavramın karışıklığa neden olduğunu ifade ederken; diğer bazı yazarlar çift taraflı hata kavramına olan ihtiyaca dikkat çekmektedir. Türk hukukunda ise çift taraflı hata kavramı henüz yeterince tartışılmamıştır. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma, hata öğretisinin ileri seviye tartışmalarından biri olan çift taraflı hata konusunu, Türk ve Alman Ceza Hukuku bağlamında değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Article Details

DOUBLE MISTAKE IN TURKISH AND GERMAN CRIMINAL LEGAL SYSTEMS

Authors:

Buket Abanoz Öztürk

Publisher:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Main Topics:

Hukuk

Journal:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.253-282

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

1/2023

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283835

pISSN:

2651-4141

Mistake

double-mistake

the mistake of elements of crime

the mistake of the objective elements justification reasons.

Hata

çift taraflı hata (doppelirrtum)

tipiklik hatası

yasak hatası

tersine unsur hatası

hukuka uygunluk nedenlerinin maddi koşullarında hata

sınırın aşılması.

Issues

Article Details

Authors: Buket Abanoz Öztürk

Publisher: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Main Topics: Hukuk

Journal: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.253-282

Document Type: Article

Publication Date: 1/2023

Document Language: Turkish

Document ID (Org No.): 2001283835

pISSN: 2651-4141

Issues

Authors:

Buket Abanoz Öztürk

Publisher:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Main Topics:

Hukuk

Journal:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.253-282

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

1/2023

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283835

pISSN:

2651-4141