TÜKETİCİ İŞLEMLERİNDE AYIBIN SEBEP OLDUĞU ZARARLARDAN SATICININ KUSURSUZ SORUMLULUĞU

Ahmet Hakan DAĞDELEN

Article Details

TÜKETİCİ İŞLEMLERİNDE AYIBIN SEBEP OLDUĞU ZARARLARDAN SATICININ KUSURSUZ SORUMLULUĞU

Authors:

Ahmet Hakan DAĞDELEN

Publisher:

Dokuz Eylul University

Journal:

Dokuz Eylul University Law Review 2018 Vol.20 Issue 2, pp.429-455

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

12/2018

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2000935637

Frequency:

Bi-Annual

eISSN:

2587-1870

pISSN:

1303-6963

Keywords:

Abstract:

 


The following judgment of the European Court of Justice deals with two

main questions. The first question is whether the seller who is not in fault is

obliged to compensate the loss of the consumer which exceeds the subjective

equivalence between the obligations of the parties arising from the contract. The

second question is whether the seller is able to refuse to replace goods not in

conformity on the ground that replacement would impose unreasonable costs on

him. The court answers the first question in the affirmative on the following

grounds: The demanded remedy had to be completed without any burden on the

consumer and any significant inconvenience to the consumer; even assuming

that the non-conformity of goods did not result from the fault of the seller, the

fact remained that by delivering goods not in conformity the seller failed

correctly to perform the obligation; the seller’s financial interests were

sufficiently protected by the Directive. Regarding the second question, the court

denies such a possibility for the seller where the repair is not possible. However,

the court also allows to imply costs on the consumer, while enabling reducement

in the reimbursement, which seems to be contradictory since the court requests

that a remedy had to be completed without any burden on the consumer. In

conclusion, however, the ruling seems fair.

.

Article Details

TÜKETİCİ İŞLEMLERİNDE AYIBIN SEBEP OLDUĞU ZARARLARDAN SATICININ KUSURSUZ SORUMLULUĞU

Authors:

Ahmet Hakan DAĞDELEN

Publisher:

Dokuz Eylul University

Journal:

Dokuz Eylul University Law Review 2018 Vol.20 Issue 2, pp.429-455

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

12/2018

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2000935637

Frequency:

Bi-Annual

eISSN:

2587-1870

pISSN:

1303-6963

Tüketicinin korunması

tüketim malları satımı ve bunlara ilişkin garantiler

1999/44 sayılı Yönerge’nin 3. maddesinin 2. ve 3. fıkraları

tek tebdir türü olarak ayıplı malların değiştirilmesi/ikame edilmesi

tüketici tarafından hazırdakurulumu yapılmış ayıplı mal

satıcının ayıplı malı kaldırması ve ikame malı kurması borcu

mutlak ölçüsüzlük

sonuçlar

Issues

Article Details

Authors: Ahmet Hakan DAĞDELEN

Publisher: Dokuz Eylul University

Journal: Dokuz Eylul University Law Review 2018 Vol.20 Issue 2, pp.429-455

Document Type: Article

Publication Date: 12/2018

Document Language: Turkish

Document ID (Org No.): 2000935637

Frequency: Bi-Annual

eISSN: 2587-1870

pISSN: 1303-6963

Issues

Authors:

Ahmet Hakan DAĞDELEN

Publisher:

Dokuz Eylul University

Journal:

Dokuz Eylul University Law Review 2018 Vol.20 Issue 2, pp.429-455

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

12/2018

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2000935637

Frequency:

Bi-Annual

eISSN:

2587-1870

pISSN:

1303-6963