The Compensation Claim of The Person Who Composed Muhdesat (Building or Plant) On Another Person’s Real Property

Kemal Erdoğan

Article Details

The Compensation Claim of The Person Who Composed Muhdesat (Building or Plant) On Another Person’s Real Property

Authors:

Kemal Erdoğan

Publisher:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Main Topics:

Hukuk

Journal:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.69-111

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

1/2023

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283836

pISSN:

2651-4141

Keywords:

Abstract:

 Muhdesat is the building andor plants created on the immovable for the permanent purpose. For this reason, the muhdesat is an integral part of the immovable property to which it belongs. The rights in rem owned on the muhdesat shall cease when they become an integral part of the immovable property. Disputes arising between the parties, if the formation of muhdesat is based on a contractual relationship, shall be resolved in accordance with these provisions. On the other hand, in the absence of a contractual relationship between the parties, the previous owners loss of the property right due to the principle of integral part creates legal problems that need to be resolved. In such a case, it is possible for the person who created the muhdesat to demand the determination that muhdesat have been created by him or her, or the payment of the muhdesat compensation. The Supreme Court of Appeals does not require the existence of certain pending lawsuits as a condition for claiming the compensation for the muhdesat, unlike the case for the determination of the muhdesat. However, in most of the decisions of The Supreme Court of Appeals regarding the collection of the compensation of the muhdesat, Article 723 of the TCC Turkish Civil Code is ignored and only the unjust enrichment provisions are taken into consideration. However, in terms of property law, the muhdesat is an unlawful buildingplant. The fact remains that, the muhdesat is an unlawful structureplant in terms of the law of property. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the relationship between Art. 723 of the TCC and the unjust enrichment rules.

 Muhdesat is the building andor plants created on the immovable for the permanent purpose. For this reason, the muhdesat is an integral part of the immovable property to which it belongs. The rights in rem owned on the muhdesat shall cease when they become an integral part of the immovable property. Disputes arising between the parties, if the formation of muhdesat is based on a contractual relationship, shall be resolved in accordance with these provisions. On the other hand, in the absence of a contractual relationship between the parties, the previous owners loss of the property right due to the principle of integral part creates legal problems that need to be resolved. In such a case, it is possible for the person who created the muhdesat to demand the determination that muhdesat have been created by him or her, or the payment of the muhdesat compensation. The Supreme Court of Appeals does not require the existence of certain pending lawsuits as a condition for claiming the compensation for the muhdesat, unlike the case for the determination of the muhdesat. However, in most of the decisions of The Supreme Court of Appeals regarding the collection of the compensation of the muhdesat, Article 723 of the TCC Turkish Civil Code is ignored and only the unjust enrichment provisions are taken into consideration. However, in terms of property law, the muhdesat is an unlawful buildingplant. The fact remains that, the muhdesat is an unlawful structureplant in terms of the law of property. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the relationship between Art. 723 of the TCC and the unjust enrichment rules.

 Muhdesat is the building andor plants created on the immovable for the permanent purpose. For this reason, the muhdesat is an integral part of the immovable property to which it belongs. The rights in rem owned on the muhdesat shall cease when they become an integral part of the immovable property. Disputes arising between the parties, if the formation of muhdesat is based on a contractual relationship, shall be resolved in accordance with these provisions. On the other hand, in the absence of a contractual relationship between the parties, the previous owners loss of the property right due to the principle of integral part creates legal problems that need to be resolved. In such a case, it is possible for the person who created the muhdesat to demand the determination that muhdesat have been created by him or her, or the payment of the muhdesat compensation. The Supreme Court of Appeals does not require the existence of certain pending lawsuits as a condition for claiming the compensation for the muhdesat, unlike the case for the determination of the muhdesat. However, in most of the decisions of The Supreme Court of Appeals regarding the collection of the compensation of the muhdesat, Article 723 of the TCC Turkish Civil Code is ignored and only the unjust enrichment provisions are taken into consideration. However, in terms of property law, the muhdesat is an unlawful buildingplant. The fact remains that, the muhdesat is an unlawful structureplant in terms of the law of property. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the relationship between Art. 723 of the TCC and the unjust enrichment rules.

 Muhdesat, taşınmaz üzerinde sürekli kalmak maksadıyla meydana getirilen yapı veveya bitkilerdir. Bu nedenle muhdesat, kapsamına dahil olduğu taşınmazın bütünleyici parçasıdır. Muhdesat üzerindeki aynî haklar, taşınmazın bütünleyici parçası hâline gelmekle son bulurlar. Taraflar arasında ortaya çıkan uyuşmazlıklar, şayet muhdesatın meydana getirilmesi akdî bir ilişkiye dayanıyorsa bu hükümlere göre çözüme kavuşturulur. Buna karşılık, taraflar arasında akdî bir ilişkinin bulunmaması hâlinde, muhdesatın önceki sahibinin bütünleyici parça ilkesi nedeniyle mülkiyet hakkını kaybetmesi, ortaya çözümlenmesi gereken hukukî problemler çıkarır. Bu ihtimalde muhdesatı meydana getiren kişi, muhdesatın kendisi tarafından meydana getirildiğinin tespit edilmesini veya kendisine muhdesat bedelinin ödenmesini talep edebilir. Yargıtay, muhdesat bedelinin talep edilebilmesi için, muhdesatın tespiti davasından farklı olarak, derdest bazı davaların bulunmasını şart olarak aramamaktadır. Ancak Yargıtayın muhdesat bedelinin ödenmesini konu edinen çoğu kararında TMK m. 723 hükmü göz ardı edilerek, salt sebepsiz zenginleşme hükümleri dikkate alınmıştır. Ne var ki muhdesat, eşya hukuku bakımından haksız yapıbitki niteliğindedir. Bu nedenle, TMK m. 723 ile sebepsiz zenginleşme kuralları arasındaki ilişkinin ayrıca incelenmesi gerekmektedir.

Article Details

The Compensation Claim of The Person Who Composed Muhdesat (Building or Plant) On Another Person’s Real Property

Authors:

Kemal Erdoğan

Publisher:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Main Topics:

Hukuk

Journal:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.69-111

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

1/2023

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283836

pISSN:

2651-4141

Muhdesat (Building or Plant)

The Case for Collection of the Compensation of Muhdesat

The Principle of Integral Part

Unlawful Building

Unjust Enrichment

Muhdesat

Muhdesat Bedelinin Tahsili Davası

Bütünleyici Parça İlkesi

Haksız Yapı

Sebepsiz Zenginleşme

Issues

Article Details

Authors: Kemal Erdoğan

Publisher: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Main Topics: Hukuk

Journal: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.69-111

Document Type: Article

Publication Date: 1/2023

Document Language: Turkish

Document ID (Org No.): 2001283836

pISSN: 2651-4141

Issues

Authors:

Kemal Erdoğan

Publisher:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Main Topics:

Hukuk

Journal:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.69-111

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

1/2023

Document Language:

Turkish

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283836

pISSN:

2651-4141