Comparison of the Efficiency of Two Different Methods in Orthognathic Model Surgery in Models with Anterior Skeletal Open Bite

Hüseyin Melik Böyük; Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim; Levent Ciğerim; Jamıl Bayzed; Ömer Sarice; Seda Kotan; Zeynep Dilan Orhan

Article Details

Comparison of the Efficiency of Two Different Methods in Orthognathic Model Surgery in Models with Anterior Skeletal Open Bite

Authors:

Hüseyin Melik Böyük | Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim | Levent Ciğerim | Jamıl Bayzed | Ömer Sarice | Seda Kotan | Zeynep Dilan Orhan

Publisher:

Istanbul Aydin University

Main Topics:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Journal:

Aydın Dental Journal Vol.9 Issue 1, pp.29-38

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

4/2023

Document Language:

English

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288540

pISSN:

2149-5572

Keywords:

Abstract:

 Abstract Objective: This study compares the success of the piezoelectric and conventional methodsin orthognathic model surgery. Material and Method: In this study, plaster models obtained on phantom models were used. Anterior skeletal open bite models for maxillary subapical osteotomy planning were created and 50 maxilla models were included in the study. Twenty-five plaster models were prepared for model surgery with a piezoelectric device, and 25 models were prepared for subapical maxillary osteotomy surgery with a handpiece device. Statistical significance was accepted as p0.05. Results: The study was carried out on a total of 50 plaster models, 50 n25 of which were applied piezo surgery and 50 n25 of the handpiece method, at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Dentistry in 2022. According to the methods, no statistically significant difference was found between the incidence of model breakage on plaster p0.05. The osteotomy time of the plaster model in which piezosurgery was applied was statistically significantly higher than the plaster model with the handpiece applied p0.001; p0.01. There was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model with piezosurgery and the model fracture p0.05. According to the model fracture, there was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model applied handpiece p0.05. Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that the surgical handpiece method was faster than the piezo surgical method in terms of the procedure time.

 Abstract Objective: This study compares the success of the piezoelectric and conventional methodsin orthognathic model surgery. Material and Method: In this study, plaster models obtained on phantom models were used. Anterior skeletal open bite models for maxillary subapical osteotomy planning were created and 50 maxilla models were included in the study. Twenty-five plaster models were prepared for model surgery with a piezoelectric device, and 25 models were prepared for subapical maxillary osteotomy surgery with a handpiece device. Statistical significance was accepted as p0.05. Results: The study was carried out on a total of 50 plaster models, 50 n25 of which were applied piezo surgery and 50 n25 of the handpiece method, at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Dentistry in 2022. According to the methods, no statistically significant difference was found between the incidence of model breakage on plaster p0.05. The osteotomy time of the plaster model in which piezosurgery was applied was statistically significantly higher than the plaster model with the handpiece applied p0.001; p0.01. There was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model with piezosurgery and the model fracture p0.05. According to the model fracture, there was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model applied handpiece p0.05. Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that the surgical handpiece method was faster than the piezo surgical method in terms of the procedure time.

 Abstract Objective: This study compares the success of the piezoelectric and conventional methodsin orthognathic model surgery. Material and Method: In this study, plaster models obtained on phantom models were used. Anterior skeletal open bite models for maxillary subapical osteotomy planning were created and 50 maxilla models were included in the study. Twenty-five plaster models were prepared for model surgery with a piezoelectric device, and 25 models were prepared for subapical maxillary osteotomy surgery with a handpiece device. Statistical significance was accepted as p0.05. Results: The study was carried out on a total of 50 plaster models, 50 n25 of which were applied piezo surgery and 50 n25 of the handpiece method, at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Dentistry in 2022. According to the methods, no statistically significant difference was found between the incidence of model breakage on plaster p0.05. The osteotomy time of the plaster model in which piezosurgery was applied was statistically significantly higher than the plaster model with the handpiece applied p0.001; p0.01. There was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model with piezosurgery and the model fracture p0.05. According to the model fracture, there was no statistically significant difference between osteotomy times in the plaster model applied handpiece p0.05. Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that the surgical handpiece method was faster than the piezo surgical method in terms of the procedure time.

 Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, ortognatik model cerrahisinde piezoelektrik ve geleneksel yöntemin etkinliğinin karrşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada fantom modeller üzerinde elde edilen alçı modeller kullanılmıştır. Maksiller subapikal osteotomi planlaması yapılan anterior iskeletsel açık kapanış modelleri oluşturulmuş ve 50 maksilla modeli çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. 25 alçı model piezoelektrik cihazı ile 25 model ise piyasemen cihazı ile subapikal maksiller osteotomi cerrahisi için model cerrahisine hazırlandı. İstatistiksel anlamlılık p0,05 olarak kabul edildi. Bulgular: Çalışma 2021-2022 tarihleri arasında Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesinde 50si n25 piezo cerrahi, 50si n25 piyasemen yöntemi uygulanan toplam 50 alçı model üzerinde yapılmıştır. Yöntemlere göre alçı üzerinde model kırılması görülme oranları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı p0,05. Piezo cerrahisi uygulanan alçı modelin osteotomi süresi, piyasemen uygulanan alçı modele göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde yüksek saptanmıştır p0,001; p0,01. Piezo cerrahisi uygulanan alçı modelde model kırığına göre osteotomi süreleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı p0,05. Piyasemen uygulanan alçı modelde model kırığına göre osteotomi süreleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık görülmedi p0,05. Sonuç: Bu çalışmada cerrahi piyasemen yönteminin işlem süresi açısından piezo cerrahi yönteminden daha hızlı olduğu görüldü.

Article Details

Comparison of the Efficiency of Two Different Methods in Orthognathic Model Surgery in Models with Anterior Skeletal Open Bite

Authors:

Hüseyin Melik Böyük | Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim | Levent Ciğerim | Jamıl Bayzed | Ömer Sarice | Seda Kotan | Zeynep Dilan Orhan

Publisher:

Istanbul Aydin University

Main Topics:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Journal:

Aydın Dental Journal Vol.9 Issue 1, pp.29-38

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

4/2023

Document Language:

English

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288540

pISSN:

2149-5572

handpiece

piezosurgery

orthodontics

model surgeryPiezo cerrahi

Piezo cerrahi

Piyasemen

Piyasemen

Model cerrahisi

Model cerrahisi

Ortodonti

Ortodonti

Piezo cerrahi, Piyasemen, Model cerrahisi, Ortodonti

Issues

Article Details

Authors: Hüseyin Melik Böyük | Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim | Levent Ciğerim | Jamıl Bayzed | Ömer Sarice | Seda Kotan | Zeynep Dilan Orhan

Publisher: Istanbul Aydin University

Main Topics: Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Journal: Aydın Dental Journal Vol.9 Issue 1, pp.29-38

Document Type: Article

Publication Date: 4/2023

Document Language: English

Document ID (Org No.): 2001288540

pISSN: 2149-5572

Issues

Authors:

Hüseyin Melik Böyük | Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim | Levent Ciğerim | Jamıl Bayzed | Ömer Sarice | Seda Kotan | Zeynep Dilan Orhan

Publisher:

Istanbul Aydin University

Main Topics:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Journal:

Aydın Dental Journal Vol.9 Issue 1, pp.29-38

Document Type:

Article

Publication Date:

4/2023

Document Language:

English

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288540

pISSN:

2149-5572